COVID-19 Pandemic: Public Health Emergency Law & Policy Responses
The Network’s monthly reporter, Judicial Trends in Public Health (JTPH), highlights key court cases and relevant judicial trends in public health. The cases below are organized under the JTPH topic, “COVID-19 Pandemic: Public Health Emergency Law & Policy Responses.”
Cases
Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd. et al. v. State Surgeon General, Florida Department of Health
Read More
Shoemaker v. UMPC Pinnacle Hospitals
Read More
Ritter et al. v. Oklahoma
Read More
Flower World v. Sacks
Read More
The Gym 24/7 Fitness, LLC v. Michigan
Read More
Grisham v. Hudson
Read More
Church v. Polis
Read More
Armstrong v. Newsom
Read More
Heidel v. Hochul
Read More
Ho v. Tulsa Spine & Specialty Hospital, L.L.C.
Read More
Explore more sub-topics related to Judicial Trends in Public Health
Reproductive Liberties and Care Access
Learn More
Source and Scope of Public Health Legal Powers
Learn More
Constitutional Rights and the Public’s Health
Learn More
Preventing and Treating Communicable Conditions
Learn More
Social Distancing Measures
Learn More
Addressing Chronic Conditions
Learn More
Mitigating the Incidence and Severity of Injuries and Other Harms
Learn More
Public Health Information Management, Privacy and Security
Learn More
Regulating Communications
Learn More
Monitoring Property and the Built Environment
Learn More
Public Health Emergency: Legal Preparedness and Response
Learn More